| 000 | 01003cab a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS52814 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u311 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aPowell-Smith, V. | ||
| 245 | 4 | _aThe abstract argument | |
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aContract Journal _v378(6025) 18 May 1995, 16-17(2) |
||
| 520 | _aConsiders cases where public authorities involved in arbitration or litigation use technical points to block claims and highlights case law to show that this does not always succeed. | ||
| 650 | _aARBITRATION ACT 1950 S27 | ||
| 650 | _aCHRISTIANI & NIELSEN LTD V BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL | ||
| 650 | _aICE ARBITRATION PROCEDURE 1993 | ||
| 650 | _aICE CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT | ||
| 650 | _aPUBLIC AUTHORITIES | ||
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION | ||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c119 _d119 |
||