000			01538cam a2200181 4500
001			##L133384
008			060505n 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u133384
041	0		_aeng
245			_aScottish & Newcastle plc v Zeljko Stephen Raguz (No 3)
520			_a[2006] EWHC 821 (Ch), 11 April 2006. Considered how S recovered £600 000 rent arrears from R following a ruling that has underlined the need for landlords to protect their recovery rights. S was the original tenant of hotel premises in Leicester under two long pre-1996 leases that had transferred its lease to R. The lease then changed hands several times and one of the tenants failed to pay the rent. S sought to recover the rent arrears from R, but R denied liability on the grounds that S had paid sums to which R was not entitled. R also tried to rely on the Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995, which states a money could be recovered if a s17 notice was served. "Held" : the decision ruled that S could recover the money because R would never have agreed to the original assignment unless payment had been made.
590			_aIKA090506
650	2	4	_aSCOTTISH AND NEWCASTLE PLC V RAGUZ
650	2	4	_aLANDLORD AND TENANT (COVENANTS) ACT 1995 S17
690			_aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-LEASEHOLD COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES-BREACHING BUSINESS TENANCIES
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2006/821.html _zView the website free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c120484 _d120484