| 000 | 00812cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3121-28 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u18169 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aSurety | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v1995 EGCS 87 (27/5/95) |
||
| 520 | _a"Kened Ltd and another v Connie Investments Ltd" CA 11 May 1995. Landlord`s appeal dismissed. Upheld the ruling that the landlord`s refusal of consent was unreasonable. The test for an acceptable replacement surety was objective. | ||
| 650 | _aASSIGNMENT | ||
| 650 | _aLEASES | ||
| 650 | _aREFUSAL OF CONSENT | ||
| 650 | _aREPLACEMENT SURETY | ||
| 650 | _aSURETY | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c12052 _d12052 |
||