| 000 | 01307nam a22002297a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | 221219e20221129xxk|||||o|||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 |
_aEastpoint Block A RTM Co Ltd v Otubaga _h[Electronic Resource] |
||
| 260 | _aUpper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) | ||
| 510 | _a[2022] UKUT 319 (LC). Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), 29 November 2022 | ||
| 520 | _aCan an RTM company which has acquired the right to manage under Chapter 1 of Part 2, Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 (the 2002 Act) apply to the appropriate tribunal for a determination under section 168(4), 2002 Act that a breach of covenant or condition has occurred? That is the short point raised by this appeal. | ||
| 520 | _aMartin Rodger KC, Deputy Chamber President presiding | ||
| 520 | _aThe following cases are referred to in this decision: Bedford v Paragon Asra Housing Association Ltd [2021] UKUT 266 (LC); Kyriacou v Linden [2021] UKUT 288 (LC) | ||
| 650 | _aCommonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 | ||
| 650 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT | ||
| 650 | _aBREACH OF COVENANT | ||
| 650 | _aRIGHT TO MANAGE | ||
| 651 | _aUnited Kingdom | ||
| 690 |
_96252 _aLandlord and tenant |
||
| 856 |
_uhttps://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukut/lc/2022/319 _zAvailable on National Archives case law service |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c121277 _d121277 |
||