| 000 | 01204nam a22001697a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | 160218e20230522xxk||||| ||||o00| 0 eng d | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 |
_aLevelling-up and Regeneration Bill debate _bHouse of Lords, 22 May 2023 _h[Electronic resource] |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the merits of including the RICS in the Bill with Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town arguing that "Clause 213 should not stand part of the Bill, as it has absolutely no place within this Bill. That is partly because it has nothing to do with levelling up or regeneration, but it is also because it gives the Government the right to interfere in the activities of an independent, non-statutory, standard-setting members’ organisation—indeed, a chartered body. | ||
| 650 | _aSURVEYING PROFESSION | ||
| 651 | _aUnited Kingdom | ||
| 690 |
_96277 _aRICS |
||
| 710 | _aParliament House of Lords | ||
| 856 |
_uhttps://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-05-22/debates/2F3D6E1F-BC73-4964-B16A-B12D47BCB6BB/Levelling-UpAndRegenerationBill _zAvailable on Hansard |
||
| 856 |
_uhttps://www.rics.org/news-insights/rics-comment-house-of-lords-debate-c213-levelling-up-regeneration-bill _zRICS Comment on Hansard debate |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c121505 _d121505 |
||