000			02002naa a22002417a 4500
008			240531e20240402xxk||||os||||o00| 0 eng d
041			_aeng
245			_aWyatt and ors v WN Enterprises Limited
260			_aLON/00BA/HYI/2023/0017, _bFirst-Tier Tribunal Property Chamber, _c2 April 2024
520			_aSpur House was previously an office block that was converted to provide the 39 flats with the commercial gym area on the ground floor. The Applicants were six long leaseholders of units within Spur House and the Respondent was the freehold owner. The Respondent was responsible for the re-development of Spur House in 2016. Defective insulation (not installed in accordance with manufacturers guidance) and balcony defects (the balconies were constructed of combustible timer decking, timber edge protection/barriers and privacy screens). The Decision: The parties indicated that the general terms of the remediation order were agreed. The FTT raised a number of points regarding the format of the order – specifically in respect of items that went beyond what could be included in the same, for example a term that a third-party contractor approve and supervise the works. Instead, the FTT suggested that this be included by way of recital to the order (as opposed to a term of the order). Amendments were also made in respect of involving the Building Safety Regulator ('BSR') and the London Fire Brigade ('LFB') - namely that they be informed of the Respondent's compliance with the terms of the remediation order.
650			_aBALCONIES
650			_aBUILDING SAFETY ACT 2022
650			_aCLADDING
650			_aDEFECTIVE MATERIALS
650			_aINSULATION
650			_aFIRE SAFETY
650			_aJUDGMENT
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1985
650			_aREMEDIATION
650			_aREMEDIATION ORDERS
651			_aUnited Kingdom
856			_uhttps://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/660ed6e39f92ac0011516d0e/Spur_Building.pdf _zAvailable from FTT
999			_c121943 _d121943