000			01515naa a22002177a 4500
007			c| aa aaaaanaa
008			241113e20241111xxk||||os||||o00| 0 eng d
041			_aeng
110			_aRoyal Courts of Justice _94330
245			_aClapham v Narga
260			_a[2024] EWCA Civ 1388 _bCourt of Appeal, _c11 November 2024
520			_aAppeal against decision of ChD allowed. A dispute about a strip of land where the owners on one side side had acquired it by adverse possession before first registration of the property on the other side. Exploration of Land Registration Act 1925 s.75; Land Registration Rules 1925 r.278 and the Land Registration Act 2002 s.60. The judgment stated that the purpose of the filed plan is to identify the property not to identify where its boundaries are. The whole point of the general boundaries rule, formerly found in rule 278 of the 1925 Rules and now found in s. 60 LRA 2002, is that the filed plan does not determine the exact line of the boundary. It was also argued that the defendant could have consulted the neighbouring landowners before, rather than after, purchasing Brook Barn. Had she done so, this boundary dispute may not have arisen.
650			_aADVERSE POSSESSION
650			_aBOUNDARIES
650			_aBOUNDARY DISPUTES
650			_aLAND REGISTRATION ACT 2002
650			_aLAND REGISTRATION ACT 1925
650			_aVALUATION
651			_aEngland
856			_uhttps://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2024/1388 _zAvailable from caselaw archive
999			_c122056 _d122056