| 000 | 01138cab a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS55731 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u18400 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aWard, C. | ||
| 245 | _aRural revivals | ||
| 260 | _c1996 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aPlanning Week _v4(32) 8 August 1996, 9(1) |
||
| 520 | _aOutlines factors which need to be considered when dealing with planning applications to convert redundant agricultural buildings including actual existence of a building on the site "Hatfield v SoS Environment" 1996 and proof of redundancy "Orbit Developments (Southern) Ltd v SoS Environment and Windsor and Maidenhead RB" 1994 and "Bruce v SoS Environment and Havering LBC" 1994. The site of the building ie green belt (PPG2) or open countryside (PPG7) has to be considered. | ||
| 650 | _aFARM BUILDINGS | ||
| 650 | _aGREEN BELT | ||
| 650 | _aLAWFUL CHANGE OF USE | ||
| 650 | _aOPEN COUNTRYSIDE | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING POLICY GUIDANCE NOTE 2 (GREEN BELTS) | ||
| 650 | _aREDUNDANT BUILDINGS | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c12223 _d12223 |
||