000			01740cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS39734
008			090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u18675
041			_aeng
245			_aRailstore Ltd v Playdale Ltd
260			_c1988
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(8835) 3 September 1988, 87-90(3)
520			_aChD 15 April 1988. A summons in which the lessees (Railstore Ltd) sought leave to appeal against an award by an arbitrator. They also sought an extension of time for making the application for leave to appeal. At issue was the effect of a provision in a rent review clause which required the arbitrator, in determining the rent, to disregard any effect on rent of any improvement carried out by the lessees. The lease was for 99 years on land with warehouse buildings. At the date of demise, planning permission existed for three more buildings. Two buildings (G), and (H) were erected by the tenants, the third building,(J), was intended for the remaining site, but was never built. The arbitrator determined that the land on which buildings G and H stood, should be valued as site value and the land on which building J was intended for, at a nil value. The present proceedings were brought to test the correctness of the award, the tenants seeking leave to appeal under the Arbitration Act 1979.
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION
650			_aBASINGSTOKE AND DEANE BC V HOST GROUP LTD
650			_aDISREGARDS
650			_aPEARL ASSURANCE PLC V SHAW
650			_aRAILSTORE LTD V PLAYDALE LTD
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-RENT REVIEWS-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c12428 _d12428