000			01381cab a2200301 4500
001			X1708
008			090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u18821
041			_aeng
245			_aClark and another v Chief Land Registrar and another; Chancery plc v Ketteringham
260			_c1994
350			_a0
490			_aAll England Law Reports _v(1994) 4 AllER 96-108(7)
520			_aCA 5 May 1994. In both cases a caution was registered with the Land Registry to protect an interest in property. Charges were subsequently entered on the register. When dispute arose it was contended that the caution should take precedence over the subsequently registered charge, the first plaintiff relying on the Land Registration Act 1925 s55 and rule 218 of the associated Rules. The court disagreed, declaring there was no entitlement to assert priority, and the defendants` appeals were dismissed.
650			_aCHANCERY PLC V KETTERINGHAM
650			_aCHARGING ORDERS ACT 1979 S2
650			_aCLARK AND ANOTHER V CHIEF LAND REGISTRAR AND ANOTHER
650			_aDEBT
650			_aLAND REGISTRATION ACT 1925 S55
650			_aLAND REGISTRATION RUELS 1925 R218
650			_aHM LAND REGISTRY
650			_aLOANS
650			_aREGISTRATION
650			_aSECURITY
690			_aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c12523 _d12523