| 000 | 01124cab a2200301 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS51273 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u18899 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aOsborn, N. | ||
| 245 | _aLiability of original lessees | ||
| 260 | _c1994 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aSolicitors` Journal _v138(32) 19 August 1994, 849(1) |
||
| 520 | _aHighlights some pitfalls of the doctrine of privity of contract, which has caused difficulties for original lessees, who remain liable on their covenants in their leases after they have assigned them. Suggests a possible solution. References to caselaw. | ||
| 650 | _aASSIGNMENT | ||
| 650 | _aCORPORATION OF CITY OF LONDON V FELL | ||
| 650 | _aESTATES GAZETTE LTD V BENJAMIN RESTAURANTS LTD | ||
| 650 | _aHINDCASTLE V BARBARA ATTENBOROUGH ASSOCIATES LTD | ||
| 650 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT (COVENANTS) BILL | ||
| 650 | _aLEASES | ||
| 650 | _aORIGINAL LESSEE | ||
| 650 | _aPRIVITY OF CONTRACT | ||
| 650 | _aWH SMITH LTD V WYNDHAM INVESTMENTS LTD | ||
| 690 |
_aLandlord and tenant _96252 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c12571 _d12571 |
||