| 000 | 01185cab a2200337 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS55827 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u19002 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aHarcup, J | ||
| 245 | _aIs a breach of covenant capable of remedy? | ||
| 260 | _c1996 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aSolicitors` Journal _v140(35) 20 September 1996, 898-899(2) |
||
| 520 | _aUses case law to illustrate the current trend of adopting a practical approach in deciding whether a breach of covenant is capable of remedy. Outlines Section 146 drafting points. | ||
| 650 | _aBILLSON AND OTHERS V RESIDENTIAL APARTMENTS LTD | ||
| 650 | _aBREACH OF COVENANT | ||
| 650 | _aEXPERT CLOTHING SERVICE V HILLGATE HOUSE | ||
| 650 | _aFORFEITURE NOTICES | ||
| 650 | _aGLASS V KENCAKES LTD | ||
| 650 | _aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S146 | ||
| 650 | _aNEGATIVE COVENANTS | ||
| 650 | _aPOSITIVE COVENANTS | ||
| 650 | _aRUGBY SCHOOL (GOVERNORS) V TANNAHILL | ||
| 650 | _aS146 NOTICES | ||
| 650 | _aSAVVA V HOUSSEIN | ||
| 650 | _aSCALA HOUSE & DISTRICT PROPERTY CO LTD V FORBES | ||
| 690 |
_aLandlord and tenant _96252 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c12645 _d12645 |
||