| 000 | 01045cab a2200289 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS55832 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u19026 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aHutchinson, L. | ||
| 245 | _aCourt clarifies repair dispute | ||
| 260 | _c1996 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aProperty Week _v59(9) 6 September 1996, 23(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the judgment in "Postel Properties Ltd v Boots the Chemist Ltd" which endorsed the landlord`s maintenance plan which included improving parts of the building to standards which were not in force when the service agreement was drawn up. | ||
| 650 |
_aBUILDING REGULATIONS _96224 |
||
| 650 | _aIMPROVEMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNED MAINTENANCE PROGRAMMES | ||
| 650 | _aPOSTEL PROPERTIES LTD AND ANOTHER V BOOTS THE CHEMIST LTD | ||
| 650 | _aRECOVERABILITY | ||
| 650 | _aREPAIRING COVENANTS | ||
| 650 | _aSERVICE CHARGES | ||
| 650 | _aSHOPPING CENTRES | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c12665 _d12665 |
||