000 02361cab a2200481 4500
001 ABS51277
008 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035 _a(Sirsi) u19216
041 _aeng
100 _aGaunt, J
245 _aVirtual reality: defining the world of rent review I and II
260 _c1994
300 _aSee also
350 _a0
490 _aEstates Gazette
_v(9433) 20 August 1994, 88-91; (9434) 27 August 199
520 _aAbridged versions of papers presented at the 1994 Blundell Memorial Lectures. Part one examines current legal issues on rent reviews referring to caselaw, considers the consequences of the vacant possession assumption, fitting-out periods and incentives, premises fit for immediate use and occupation, disregard of rent-free periods, the assumption that a rent-free period has expired, and the assumption of compliance with repairing covenants. Part two looks at valuation aspects, including the effects of the development cycle, the effect of inducements on value, the role of the courts in dealing with rent review cases, built-in discounts, fitted-out assumptions and commercial bargaining in the property market.
650 _a99 BISHOPSGATE LTD V PRUDENTIAL ASSURANCE CO LTD
650 _aBASINGSTOKE AND DEANE BC V HOST GROUP LTD
650 _aBLUNDELL MEMORIAL LECTURES 1994
650 _aBROADGATE SQUARE PLC V LEHMAN BROTHERS LTD
650 _aCITY OFFICES PLC V BRYANSTON INSURANCE CO LTD
650 _aCO-OPERATIVE WHOLESALE SOCIETY LTD V NATIONAL WESTMINSTER
650 _aDISREGARDS
650 _aFITTING-OUT PERIODS
650 _aHEADLINE RENT
650 _aICELAND FROZEN FOODS PLC V STARLIGHT INVESTMENTS LTD
650 _aLAND SECURITIES PLC V CITY OF WESTMINSTER
650 _aLEASE INCENTIVES
650 _aLONDON & LEEDS ESTATES LTD V PARIBAS LTD
650 _aMALLINSON REPORT
650 _aORCHID LODGE (UK) LTD V EXTEL COMPUTING LTD
650 _aPONTSARN INVESTMENTS LTD V KANSALLIS-OSAKE-PANKKI
650 _aPRUDENTIAL NOMINEES V GREENHAM TRADING
650 _aRENT REVIEWS
650 _aRENT-FREE PERIODS
650 _aSCOTTISH AMICABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY V MIDDLETON
650 _aVALUATION ISSUES
650 _aWINDFALL
690 _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-RENT REVIEWS
700 _aMain, R.
942 _n0
948 _c04/03/1997
999 _c12806
_d12806