000			01265cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS55873
008			090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u19314
041			_aeng
245			_aEnfield LBC v Castles Estate Agents Ltd
260			_c1996
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[1996] 36 EG 145-148(4)
520			_aQBD 16 February 1996. C advertised and provided sales particulars of a semi-detached house and an adjoining building described as a bungalow. E issued two summonses against C alleging contravention of the Property Misdescriptions Act 1991 on the grounds that there was no planning permission for the use of the bungalow as a dwelling house. The magistrates court dismissed the summonses. Although the court found that the statements in the sales particulars were misleading, C had established the statutory defence in s2(1) that they had exercised due diligence. E appealed. Appeal dismissed.
650			_aDUE DILIGENCE
650			_aENFIELD LBC V CASTLES ESTATE AGENTS LTD
650			_aMISLEADING STATEMENTS
650			_aPLANNING PERMISSION
650			_aPROPERTY MISDESCRIPTIONS ACT 1991
690			_aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c12882 _d12882