000			01701cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS51279
008			090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u19345
041			_aeng
245			_aHammersmith and Fulham LBC v Hill
260			_c1994
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1994) 35 EG 124-126(3)
520			_aCA 15 April 1994. In 1990 orders were made for possession of the premises not to be enforced for 28 days and for as long as H paid arrears, mesne profits and costs. H failed to pay off the arrears and a warrant for possession was executed. H applied to the county court to set this aside and to suspend the warrant. The arrears were reduced but the court refused to set aside the possession order but varied it so that possession could not be obtained if H continued to pay off current rent and £2.15 per week towards arrears. They also set aside the warrant for possession. The council appealed contending the court had no power to set it aside. H cross appealed on the grounds that she had not been informed of her right to apply to the court under Housing Act 1985 s85(2) to suspend the warrant before its execution and was misled as to the amount of arrears and likely conditions of suspension. The two appeals were allowed however it was seen that there was an arguable case on oppression whic
650			_aHOUSING ACT 1985 S85(2)
650			_aPOSSESSION PROCEEDINGS
650			_aRENT ARREARS
650			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
650			_aWARRANT FOR POSSESSION
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c12906 _d12906