000			01312cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS55883
008			090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u19416
041			_aeng
245			_aCadogan and others v Royal Brompton Hospital National Health Trust
260			_c1996
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[1996] 37 EG 142-144(3)
520			_aChD 9 May 1996. The predecessor in title to the plaintiff trustees (C) gave land to the trustees of the Chelsea Hospital for Women. The indenture was subject to two restrictive covenants: the land was not to be used for any other purposes except for the hospital and no building could be erected until the external elevations had been approved by the Cadogan Estate. C sought declarations that the covenants were enforceable against the hospital. "Held" C dissentitled from enforcing the first covenant by an injunction but can restrain the defendant from erecting a building as long as it is not for a statutory purpose.
650			_aCOMPULSORY PURCHASE ACT 1990
650			_aHOSPITAL BUILDINGS
650			_aNATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE AND COMMUNITY CARE ACT 1990
650			_aRESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
650			_aSTATUTORY POWERS
690			_aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c12958 _d12958