000			01642cab a2200217 4500
001			ABS39854
008			090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u19450
041			_aeng
245			_aGisbourne and another v Burton
260			_c1988
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(8838) 24 September 1988, 129-140(7)
520			_aCA 21 July 1988. Appeal by Burton (B) against a decision in the county court granting possession to Gisbourne and another (G), representatives of the deceased Christopherson (C). C owned a farm which he had trouble farming. B, a neighbour, offered to farm it and C consulted his solicitor who devised a scheme whereby B would be prevented from benefitting from security of tenure under the Agricultural Holdings Act 1948 . C granted a tenancy of the farm to his wife, who in turn granted a sub-tenancy to B - thus B became a sub-tenant of C. In 1984, C died and his representatives, G, served notice to quit on his widow; she did not serve a counternotice and her tenancy expired. G then claimed possession of the farm without serving any notice to quit, on the ground that the appellants sub-tenancy had come to an end. The county court judge made an order for possession and B appealed to the CA. At issue was whether the grant of a tenancy and a sub-tenancy was a "sham" designed to avoid securi
650			_aAGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS NOTICES TO QUIT ACT 1977 S2
650			_aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-TENANCIES-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES
650			_aJOHNSON V MORETON
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c12984 _d12984