000			01459cab a2200181 4500
001			ABS39863
008			090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u19549
041			_aeng
245			_aScott-James v Chehab and others
260			_c1988
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(8841) 15 October 1988, 75-80(3)
520			_aCA 25 February 1988. An appeal by Chehab, leasehold owners of property which included a basement flat against the decision in favour of the occupier, Scott-James. Previously, the recorder in the county court had made an order for possession against the occupier, suspended during prompt payment of rent and a monthly sum in respect of arrears. The county court judge had set aside a warrant of possession executed by bailiffs and as a result of which the occupier had been evicted. The possession order as drafted was faulty and had to be amended under the slip rule in CCR, Ord 15, r5. If the slip rule amendment operated retroactively, the occupier had been in breach of the condition in the possession order, but if it did not so operate, the warrant was premature, as the judge held. CA held that the slip rule was retroactive in its effect, that the condition had been breached and that the judge was therefore wrong in deciding that the warrant was premature. In allowing the appeal a number
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c13063 _d13063