| 000 | 00901cab a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3302-24 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1997 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u19560 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aReasonable performance | ||
| 260 | _c1997 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(9701) 11 January 1997, 123(1) |
||
| 520 | _aUses case law to demonstrate the problems that can arise when a tenants break option depends on a precondition requiring either substantial compliance with the lease covenants or `reasonable performance`. | ||
| 650 | _aBASSETT V WHITELY | ||
| 650 | _aBREAK OPTIONS | ||
| 650 | _aGARDNER V BLAXHILL | ||
| 650 | _aLEASES | ||
| 650 | _aPRECONDITIONS | ||
| 650 | _aREASONABLE PERFORMANCE | ||
| 650 | _aREED PERSONNEL SERVICES V AMERICAN EXPRESS EUROPE | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c13070 _d13070 |
||