000			01520cab a2200205 4500
001			ABS39890
008			090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u19840
041			_aeng
245			_aCivil Service Building Society v MacDougall
260			_c1988
350			_a0
490			_aScots Law Times _v(1988) SLT 687(4)
520			_aSecond division 30 November 1987. Action for damages raised by building society (C) against chartered surveyor (M), alleging negligence in the valuation of three properties on the security of which C advanced funds. C was unable to recover its advances when the borrowers defaulted and sought to recover its losses from M, alleging that M had placed excessive values on the properties. M denied negligence, submitting that in each case the property had been competently valued, taking into account prices obtained for similar properties and comparisons with rateable values. Following a procedure roll debate C enrolled for commission and diligence for the recovery of documents from M, as the documents contained details of the prices and rateable values. M opposed the motion as being premature as proof had not yet been allowed in the action, claiming that such a diligence was a fishing diligence. The Lord Ordinary agreed with M and refused the motion. C reclaimed, submitting that the court w
650			_aMORTGAGE VALUATIONS
650			_aSCOTLAND
690			_aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c13287 _d13287