000			01472cab a2200193 4500
001			ABS39892
008			090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u19857
041			_aeng
245			_aCarne and another v Debono
260			_c1988
350			_a0
490			_aWeekly Law Reports _v(1988) 1 WLR 1107-1113(7)
520			_aCA 27 June 1988. 1 February 1985: the purchaser agreed to buy a house subject to planning permission conditions and the release of restrictive covenants . 16 December 1985: contractual date for completion fixed. November 1986: terms agreed for the release of the covenants. 13 January 1987: the vendors gave notice requiring completion of the contract and making time of the essence. That notice was treated by the parties`solicitors as expiring on 5 February: on that day at 10.10 the vendors`solicitors sent a letter by fax to the purchaser`s solicitors which contained a completion statement. Completion was due by midday. The letter was inconsistent with the amount of interest being demanded, which was itself in dispute. Completion did not take place. The vendors`solicitors wrote on the following day informing the purchaser`s solicitors that the contract was terminated and that the vendors would retain the deposit. The vendors began proceedings in which they claimed a declaration that th
650			_aVENDOR AND PURCHASER
690			_aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c13301 _d13301