000			00932cab a2200205 4500
001			X1875
008			090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u20098
041			_aeng
245			_aBank of Baroda v Rayarel
260			_c1995
350			_a0
490			_aNew Property Cases _v1995 NPC 6
520			_aCA 13 January 1995. A bank which insists on a warningclause in a second charge on a family home which states that the chargor had been advised firstly of the nature of the what she is doing and further that she has the right to take independent legal advice, and entrusts the execution of that document to a solicitor who was its sole channel of communication, is not liable under the principles of "Barclays Bank v O`Brien". NOT TO BE PHOTOCOPIED.
650			_aINCREASED OVERDRAFT
650			_aSECOND MORTAGE
690			_aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c13464 _d13464