| 000 | 01042cab a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS50893 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u352 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aSmith, Peter F. | ||
| 245 | _aRepairing obligations: a case against radical reform | ||
| 260 | _c1994 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aConveyancer & Property Lawyer _v(1994) Conv 186-195(10) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the case for reform of the law of repairing obligations, following the Law Commission`s provisional recommendations in a consultation paper "Responsibility for state and condition of property". Compares the rules for residential lessees in California and France, and suggests that these could improve the rules in the UK. | ||
| 650 | _aCALIFORNIA | ||
| 650 | _aCONSULTATION PAPER | ||
| 650 | _aFRANCE | ||
| 650 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1985 | ||
| 650 | _aLAW COMMISSION | ||
| 650 | _aLEASES | ||
| 650 | _aREPAIRING OBLIGATIONS | ||
| 690 |
_aLandlord and tenant _96252 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c135 _d135 |
||