000			01543cab a2200193 4500
001			ABS39963
008			090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u20322
041			_aeng
245			_aGozra v Hackney LBC
260			_c1988
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(8846) 19 November 1988, 87-88(2)
520			_aCA 12 May 1988 Appeal by local authority (H) from LT decision on a question of its jurisdiction under Land Compensation Act 1973 s38(4) to determine a dispute as to the amount of payment under s37(5) of the Act. S38(4) provided that any dispute as to the amount of a disturbance payment shall be referred to and determined by LT. The issue was as to whether the discretionary payment under s37(5) was a "disturbance payment" for this purpose. S37(5) covers cases where a person is displaced from land but is not entitled, as against the local authority, "to a disturbance payment or to compensation for disturbance under any other enactment". It was submitted by H that the 1973 Act drew a clear distinction between a disturbance payment and discretionary payment. It was contended that the jurisdiction conferred on LT related only to an actual disturbance payment. CA held, dismissing appeal, that s38(4) of the 1973 Act gave LT jurisdiction as to the amount of a disturbance payment. Although H
650			_aLAND COMPENSATION ACT 1973 S37 5
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-COMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c13615 _d13615