000			01530cab a2200205 4500
001			ABS39995
008			090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u20518
041			_aeng
245			_aMaraday Ltd v Sturt Properties Ltd
260			_c1988
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(8846) 19 November 1988, 99-100(2)
520			_aChD 8 July 1988 Originating summons taken out by Maraday (M) to determine validity of a notice served by Sturt Properties (S) activating a rent review clause in the lease of warehouse premises. Review clause provided that after an initial seven-year period at a stated rent, the remainder of the term should be divided into two periods of five and three years respectively. The first review period commenced in March 1987, due to expire in March 1992. Material part of clause provided that the open market in rental value was to be such a sum as should be specified in a notice in writing by the lessor "served at least six months before expiration of the period in question". The question was what was the "period in question". The remainder of the lease after March 1987 had been divided into two periods of five and three years and these were defined as the "review periods". S`s notice proposing to exercise their right to review the rent was given in January 1987. ChD held, that unless he was
650			_aBUSINESS TENANCIES
650			_aCONSTRUCTION OF CLAUSE
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEWS
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c13746 _d13746