000			01459cab a2200181 4500
001			ABS39997
008			090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u20533
041			_aeng
245			_aGhelani v Bowie and others
260			_c1988
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(8842) 22 October 1988, 119-120(2)
520			_aCA 18 March 1988. Appeal by landlord (G) from cc decision dismissing claim for possession of a dwelling-house, occupied by five trainee surveyors (B). The house had been let on a regulated tenancy for 11 months jointly from 23 August 1986, terminable by four weeks notice on either side. The rent was originally £180pw; this was later reduced to £85pw by the rent officer and rent assessment committee. Notice to quit was dated 12 December 1986, less than four months after the start of the 11 month term. Cc heard conflicting evidence as to G`s stated intentions at the commencement of the tenancy. G claimed to have said that she intended to go to India for medical treatment, a visit anticipated to last for some months, but that on her return she would wish to resume possession of the premises. B contended that G had given no indication of requiring repossession, and had even suggested that the tenancy might be renewable. Cc found that 1) G had failed to satisfy the burden of proof that sh
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c13756 _d13756