000			01565cab a2200193 4500
001			ABS39999
008			090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u20547
041			_aeng
245			_aR v Rent Officer for Camden LBC , ex parte Felix
260			_c1988
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1988) EG 119-118(5)
520			_aQBD 5 September 1988 Applications for judicial review by Felix (F) of determinations by rent officers relating to four properties. The first application to the rent officer had been signed by two out of three joint tenants. QBD held that the two who signed were authorised to apply on behalf of the third, but preferred however, to rest its decision on the alternative ground that the evidence justified the conclusion that the agreement made with F was a grant of a joint tenancy to the three, to be followed on the departure of one by a joint tenancy of the other two. Application therefore failed. The second application was signed by one only of five joint tenants. F had received notice and invitation to attend a consultation, but he did not attend. All five tenants attended and the other four joint tenants signed the application. A copy of the amended application was sent to F and an invitation to a fresh consultation. This was returned with a note that it had not been "called for". Ren
650			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c13764 _d13764