000			01222cab a2200277 4500
001			ABS56035
008			090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u20575
041			_aeng
245			_aPostel Properties Ltd and another v Boots the Chemist
260			_c1996
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[1996] 41 EG 164-168(5) (12/10/96)
520			_aQBD 25 July 1996. Boots, representing the tenants of the Milton Keynes Shopping Centre, argued that works to roof and windows of centre were improvements and not repairs. Boots argued that the cost of the works was not therefore recoverable from tenants via service charges. Held, that except for priming of roof troughs the works were repairs even if the specification was higher than original.
650			_aDAI-ICHI (PROPERTY) LONDON LTD
650			_aHERMES
650			_aIMPROVEMENTS
650			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING MAINTENANCE AND REFURBISHMENT
650			_aMILTON KEYNES SHOPPING CENTRE
650			_aPOSTEL PROPERTIES LTD AND ANOTHER V BOOTS THE CHEMIST
650			_aREPAIRS
650			_aSERVICE CHARGES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c13783 _d13783