| 000 | 01156cab a2200289 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS50935 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u2285 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aCondron, M. | ||
| 245 | _aRestoration benefits count in planning law calculation | ||
| 260 | _c1994 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aPlanning (for the Natural and Built Environment) _v(1072) 10 June 1994, 6(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses two recent cases which have tested planning law on the extent to which restoration gains resulting from development can be construed as a material consideration, and also has the mechanisms to ensure that funds raised are devoted to refurbishment: "Worsted Investments Ltd v SoS Environment and another" (WB3014-20); "South Oxfordshire DC v SoS Environment and others" (WB3018-11) | ||
| 650 | _aECONOMIC VIABILITY | ||
| 650 | _aLISTED BUILDINGS | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING GAIN | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING PERMISSION | ||
| 650 | _aREPAIRS | ||
| 650 | _aRESTORATION BENEFITS | ||
| 650 | _aRESTORATION GAINS | ||
| 650 | _aVIABILITY | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c1379 _d1379 |
||