| 000 | 01272cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS56037 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u20593 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aSoS Environment v Associated Newspapers Holdings Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c1996 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v[1996] 72 P&CR 395-401(4) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 27 October 1995. A disagreement between the lessee and the lessor on the nature of a rent review clause in the underlease of an office building. The lessee argued that the clause provided for an upwards only rent review on the first review and on subsequent reviews could be increased or reduced subject to a threshold provision. The lessor argued that the clause provided for an upwards only rent review on each review i.e. a ratchet provision. The ChD judge decided in favour of the lessor`s interpretation. Lessee`s appeal dismissed. | ||
| 650 | _aCOMMERCIAL PROPERTY RENTS | ||
| 650 | _aMARKET RENTAL VALUES | ||
| 650 | _aRATCHET RENTS | ||
| 650 | _aRENT REVIEWS | ||
| 650 | _aSOS ENVIRONMENT V ASSOCIATED NEWSPAPERS HOLDINGS LTD | ||
| 650 | _aUPWARD ONLY RENT REVIEWS | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEWS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c13794 _d13794 |
||