000			01507cab a2200205 4500
001			ABS40020
008			090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u20742
041			_aeng
245			_aFaruk v Wyse and others
260			_c1988
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(8844) 5 November 1988, 88-97(5)
520			_aChD 10 June 1988 Action by Faruk (F) against the first and second defendants Wyse (W) and Rockman who carried out an estate agents ` business under the name " Kennedy Law " and the third defendant Murphy (M) arising out of a purported tenancy or licence agreement. F had decided to let an inherited house to a company and had instructed the agents to find a suitable tenant. The partner responsible was W, but a young assistant was entrusted with the lettings and dealt with the transactions from beginning to end. She had had no training and no comprehension of any of the legal forms she used. M, a divorcee who was selling the matrimonial home expressed an interest in the house and W, realising that he could earn two commission s, one for selling M`s house and one for securing a letting for M, instructed his assistant to make arrangements. No enquiries were made about M`s means and in 1984 M entered into a licence agreement purporting to be between F as licensor and M`s employer, a cricke
650			_aLIABILITY
650			_aNEGLIGENCE
690			_aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c13897 _d13897