| 000 | 01512cab a2200193 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS37100 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1986 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u2303 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aNorwich Union Life Insurance Society v Sketchley plc | ||
| 260 | _c1986 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v280 (6309) 8 November 1986, 773-780(5) |
||
| 520 | _aChD 24 July 1986. Originating summons by N seeking declarations in favour of their claim to proceed with a rent review . S counterclaimed. The 21-year lease with provision for an upward only rent review; a trigger notice to be served "at any one time" after 14 years. The 14th year commenced on 29 September 1981. On 27 August 1982 a letter was sent by N`s surveyors stating that they had been instructed to negotiate the rent review effective as at 29 September 1982, proposing a rent of £11,500. S invited negotiations which were unsuccessful. If no agreement was reached within 3 months the landlords could require reference to a third party surveyor by giving notice 3 months thereafter. This notice was not served within the time limit . S argued that N had lost its chance to have the rent increased. In June 1983 N`s solicitors wrote, enclosing a second trigger notice, followed by a notice requiring reference to an expert which was served within the time limit. At issue was whether the re | ||
| 650 | _aTIME OF THE ESSENCE | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEWS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c1392 _d1392 |
||