| 000 | 00924cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2741-36 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u20820 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aOccupier loses home despite beneficial interest | ||
| 260 | _c1991 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aChartered Surveyor Weekly _v37 (4) 24 October 1991, 83-84(2) |
||
| 520 | _a"Equity & Law Home Loans v Prestridge and another" CA 3 October 1991". In considering an appeal against a mortgage repossession order it was held that the beneficial interest of the occupier should rank behind the interest of new mortgagees. Considered "Bristol & West Building Society v Henning" 1985. Repossession order granted. | ||
| 650 | _aBENEFICIAL INTEREST | ||
| 650 | _aMORTGAGES | ||
| 650 | _aOCCUPIERS | ||
| 650 | _aPOSSESSION ORDER | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c13953 _d13953 |
||