| 000 | 01377cab a2200289 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS56076 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u20956 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aChequepoint UK Ltd and Palisade Investments Ltd v SoS Envt and RB Kensington and Chelsea | ||
| 260 | _c1996 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v[1996] 72 P&CR 415-422(5) |
||
| 520 | _aQBD 17 November 1995. The applicants had first put a sign above their shop in 1976 with consent, the colour changed in 1986 and it enjoyed deemed consent. In 1992 and 1993 the applicants applied for express consent for a new sign, the local planning authority issued a discontinuance notice. The applicants argued the authority had not taken into consideration various points when making their decision. Application dismissed. | ||
| 650 | _aADVERTISEMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aCHEQUEPOINT UK LTD AND PALISADE INVESTMENTS LTD V SOS ENVIRONMENT AND | ||
| 650 | _aCONSERVATION AREAS | ||
| 650 | _aCONTROL OF ADVERTISEMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aDEEMED CONSENT | ||
| 650 | _aDISCONTINUANCE NOTICE | ||
| 650 | _aEXPRESS CONSENT | ||
| 650 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (CONTROL OF ADVERTISEMENT) REGULATIONS 1992 | ||
| 650 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S288 | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c14055 _d14055 |
||