000			01440cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS56079
008			090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u20987
041			_aeng
245			_aKayworth v Highways Agency
260			_c1996
350			_a0
490			_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v[1996] 72 P&CR 433-439(4)
520			_aLT 14 June 1996. The claimants (K) served a blight notice as their property was partly situated within the formal safeguarding corridor for the widening of the A1 to motorway standard. The Highways Agency (HA) served a counter notice on the grounds that they did not intend to acquire any part of the property. K challenged the HA notice, the HA responded by stating that the road widening would now take place on the opposite side of the road and had been so reported in the newspaper. K pointed out that the new route had not been notified to the local authority for search purposes and that two nearby houses had been purchased by the HA. Held, that the agency`s objection in the counter notice was not well founded as it had not informed the local authority formally of its changed intention.
650			_aBLIGHT NOTICES
650			_aCOUNTER NOTICE
650			_aKAYWORHTH V HIGHWAYS AGENCY
650			_aROAD WIDENING
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S150
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c14079 _d14079