| 000 | 00983cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS56095 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u21141 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aKwiatkowski, F. | ||
| 245 | _aUndue influence | ||
| 260 | _c1996 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aSolicitors` Journal _v140(39) 18 October 1996, 1000-1001(2) |
||
| 520 | _aQuestions the Court of Appeal decision in "Credit Lyonnais Bank Nederland v Burch" where an employee mortgaged her home at the insistence of her employer to extend the company`s overdraft limit. It was held that as a result of undue influence the bank could not make a claim against the employee even though it was her own choice not to take legal advice. | ||
| 650 | _aBARCLAYS BANK PLC V OBRIEN | ||
| 650 | _aCREDIT LYONNAIS BANK NEDERLAND V BURCH | ||
| 650 | _aPROFESSIONAL ADVICE | ||
| 650 | _aUNDUE INFLUENCE | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c14188 _d14188 |
||