| 000 | 01076cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS56097 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u21162 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aBradford and Bingley Building Society v Chandock and Chandock | ||
| 260 | _c1996 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v[1996] 72 P&CR D28-D30(2) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 3 April 1996. The defendant, Mrs Chandock claimed that she had acted at all time under the undue influence of her husband. the £60,000 debt that had therefore accrued as a result of mortgage payment arrears under a mortgage in her name could not be claimed by the building society. Held, that the building society had taken all reasonable measures to advise Mrs Chandock. A possession order was granted. | ||
| 650 | _aBARCLAYS BANK V OBRIEN | ||
| 650 | _aBRADFORD AND BINGLEY BUILDING SOCIETY V CHANDOCK AND ANOTHER | ||
| 650 | _aMORTGAGE PAYMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aUNDUE INFLUENCE | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c14203 _d14203 |
||