| 000 | 01073cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS56111 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u21294 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aMakro Self-service Wholesalers Ltd v Brennan (VO) | ||
| 260 | _c1996 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aRating Appeals _v[1996] RA 341-408(35) |
||
| 520 | _aLT 30 November 1995. VO argued that the Cash and Carry was not an ordinary warehouse and the valuation should be amended accordingly. Held that if the property were vacant its most obvious use would be as a warehouse and the only differentiations were a superior finish and large car parking provision and value should be based on general level of warehouse values with an allowance of 6.6% for superior finishes. | ||
| 650 | _aCASH AND CARRY | ||
| 650 | _aMAKRO SELF-SERVICE WHOLESALERS LTD V BRENNAN (VO) | ||
| 650 | _aRATEABLE VALUES | ||
| 650 | _aRATING APPEALS | ||
| 650 | _aREDUCTION | ||
| 650 | _aWAREHOUSES | ||
| 690 | _aRATING AND VALUATION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c14297 _d14297 |
||