| 000 | 00952cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS56114 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u21321 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aWhitbread plc v Lothian Region Assessor | ||
| 260 | _c1996 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aRating Appeals _v[1996] RA 417-421(3) |
||
| 520 | _aLV AC 7 May 1996. Ratepayers wanted premises to be valued by comparison, not by turnover and in addition they argued the premises more resembled a public house than a restaurant. Held, the assessor`s turnover method was justified and there was insufficient justification to categorise premises as a public house. | ||
| 650 | _aPUBLIC HOUSES | ||
| 650 | _aRATING APPEALS | ||
| 650 | _aRESTAURANTS | ||
| 650 | _aTURNOVER | ||
| 650 | _aVALUATION METHODS | ||
| 650 | _aWHITBREAD PLC V LOTHIAN REGION ASSESSOR | ||
| 690 | _aRATING AND VALUATION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c14316 _d14316 |
||