| 000 | 01493cab a2200181 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS40096 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u21444 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aRichard Roberts Holdings Ltd v Douglas Smith Stimson Partnership and others | ||
| 260 | _c1988 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aConstruction Industry Law Letter _v1988 CILL 444-445(2) |
||
| 520 | _aQB 27 October 1988. The plaintiffs (R) owned shares in a dye works let to a company in a group of textile companies they also owned. R claimed damages from the architect (D) in respect of alterations to the works and from one subcontractor (E) who had designed and lined the effluent cooling tank . R`s claim against D was for alleged breach of express or implied terms in contract and in negligence in allowing E`s method of lagging the tank, certain aspects of design and in issuing the final certificate. D denied liability in respect of the tank but admitted other allegations. However D alleged contributory negligence by R and a contribution towards damages from E. It was held that E was negligent in respect of the tank. D however were equally responsible but R were not contributorily negligent. R had also claimed damages in respect of loss of earnings for the company occupying the dye works while repairs were completed. However this was rejected as the dye works and R were separate le | ||
| 690 | _aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c14395 _d14395 |
||