000			01537cab a2200265 4500
001			ABS50938
008			090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u2402
041			_aeng
245			_aJacques Amand Ltd v SOS Environment and Harrow LBC
260			_c1994
350			_a0
490			_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v(1994) 67 P&CR 192-198(7)
520			_aQBD 15 June 1993. H issued an enforcement notice against J alleging breach of planning control in retention of a single storey lean-to structure at a nursery. J appealed. H and J agreed that the main use of the site was for horticulture. The Inspector held that the main use was wholesale distribution of bulbs and he would need to ask for special circumstances before considering it appropriate to grant consent in the Green Belt. J challenged this on the grounds that the inspector had raised a new issue of fact. He was in error by failing to make reference to a decision by another inspector on a neighbouring site held to be for horticultural use. Application dismissed; H`s agreement with J on use of the site did not bind the inspector who had explained clearly why he found the primary use of the site not to be horticultural.
650			_aBREACH
650			_aENFORCEMENT NOTICES
650			_aGREEN BELT
650			_aHORTICULTURAL USE
650			_aINQUIRY PROCEDURE RULES
650			_aMAIL ORDER OPERATION
650			_aPLANNING CONTROL
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c1449 _d1449