000			01245cab a2200181 4500
001			ABS40127
008			090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u21647
041			_aeng
245			_aKemp v Neptune Concrete Ltd
260			_c1988
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(8848) 3 December 1988, 71-79(4)
520			_aCA 9 June 1988. An appeal against a County Court decision to dismiss a claim by the landlord (K) for rectification of a lease of commercial premises. A draft lease provided a term of six years with a rent review after three. During negotiations the lease term was extended to 12 years with no mention of a second rent review. K`s solicitor eventually realised the mistake and requested an amendment but this was refused and litigation followed. The County Court rejected the claim for rectification on the grounds that the landlord was under the impression that there was more than one rent review. The appeal was dismissed on the grounds that the existence of a mistake by the landlord when executing the deed had not been shown, although an ex post facto intention might have been formed.
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c14520 _d14520