| 000 | 01320cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS51317 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u21659 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aNottingham CC v Garnett (VO) | ||
| 260 | _c1994 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aRating & Valuation Reporter _v34(5) R&VR May 1994, 102-105(4) |
||
| 520 | _aLVT 15 April 1994. An appeal against an assessment of the rateable value of a concert hall and theatre in Nottingham. N appealed against an entry in the rating list showing a value of £1,230,000, arrived at by the VO who used the contractors` test method. It was proposed on behalf of N that a `quasi profits basis` was the preferred option. The parties had agreed that if the LVT found for N, the rv would be determined at £174,000; if they found for the VO, the rv was to be determined at £560,000. The LVT concluded that the VO`s suggested rv value was not supported by the rateable values of similar hereditaments put forward, and could find no reason to disagree with the £174,000 submitted on behalf of N. Rateable value reduced to £174,000. | ||
| 650 | _aCONCERT HALLS | ||
| 650 | _aCONTRACTORS TEST | ||
| 650 | _aRATING APPEALS | ||
| 650 | _aTHEATRES | ||
| 690 | _aRATING AND VALUATION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c14527 _d14527 |
||