000			01463cab a2200181 4500
001			ABS40143
008			090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u21733
041			_aeng
245			_aChurch Cottage Investments Limited v Hillingdon LBC
260			_c1988
350			_a0
490			_aRating & Valuation Reporter _v1988 RVR 225-228(4)
520			_aLT 18 August 1988. The claimant`s (C) property comprised 38 self contained flats in a 3 and 4 storey flat roofed building. In November 1983 they applied for planning permission to construct 4 self contained flats on the existing 3 storey part. The council failed to make a decision within the statutory time. In December 1984 C`s claim to the SoS was dismissed. In February C served a notice on the council claiming the value of the property was less than it would have been if planning permission had been granted and claiming compensation equal to the difference in value. This was based on Town and Country Planning Act 1971 s169 which entitles them to compensation for a refusal of planning permission for an enlargement not exceeding 1/10th of the cubic capacity of the existing building. The council claimed that the extension would cause problems of overloading but C claimed that measures would be taken to prevent this. It was held that the extension would not receive building regulations
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c14573 _d14573