000			01809cab a2200289 4500
001			ABS50939
008			090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u2445
041			_aeng
245			_aR v Wakefield MBC and British Coal Corporation ex parte The Warmfield Company Limited
260			_c1994
350			_a0
490			_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v(1994) 67 PCR 199-215(17)
520			_aQBD 29 July 1993. In October 1989 the first respondent (W) granted planning permission to the second respondent (B) for the extraction of coal and clay from land in September 1990. W approved a reserved matters application by B relating to the possible diversion of the River Calder pursuant to permission granted in 1985. In July 1991 planning permission was granted for the extraction of minerals from a site near the river. The legality of the decisions were challenged in three applications. The first challenged the 1989 permission on the grounds that the alterations to the application were so substantial that a new application was required. This was dismissed on the grounds that W were entitled to exercise their discretion to treat the alterations as amendments. The second challenged the 1990 approval of the river diversion on the grounds that W had acted ultra vires and unreasonably. This was dismissed on the grounds that W had not acted unreasonably in treating the application as o
650			_aCOAL MINING
650			_aMINERAL EXTRACTION
650			_aMINERALS
650			_aOPENCAST MINING
650			_aPLANNING PERMISSION
650			_aR V GOUGH
650			_aR V SEVENOAKS DC EX P TERRY
650			_aRIVER DIVERSION
690			_aMINING AND MINERALS-CASE LAW
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c1477 _d1477