| 000 | 01048cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | X2195 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u22479 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aTandridge DC and Hitchinson Microtel Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aPlanning Appeal Decisions _v(1995) 10 PAD 112-115 |
||
| 520 | _a9 August 1994. Telecommunications mast - alleged by appellant that works carried out at time when authorised by general development order (GDO) - Council contends that works not carried out until after GDO had been amended and appellant should first have obtained clearance from Council - enforcement notice quashed but application for award of costs refused. (Headnote from journal). | ||
| 650 | _aENFORCEMENT NOTICES | ||
| 650 | _aGDOS | ||
| 650 | _aGENERAL DEVELOPMENT ORDERS | ||
| 650 | _aTELECOMMUNICATIONS MAST | ||
| 650 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING GENERAL DEVELOPMENT ORDER 1988 | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c15063 _d15063 |
||