000			01262cab a2200181 4500
001			ABS40258
008			090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u22586
041			_aeng
245			_aCox v Binfield
260			_c1989
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1989) 01 EG 69-70(2)
520			_aCA 20 June 1988. An appeal by the tenant from a decision of the assistant recorder, dismissing his application for a new tenancy to carry on a cafe business. The landlord objected under Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 s30(1)(g) , and claimed the premises were required by herself to carry on her own business, and for residential use. At issue, was whether the landlord had a genuine intention in accordance with the law. The judge held that there was a genuine intention, and the tenant appealed. On appeal, the tenant`s appeal was dismissed. The CA held that it was not possible to set the judge`s decision aside, even though the landlord`s venture was not likely to succeed; the landlord required downstairs accommodation, and although there was a possibility the plans might fail, they were nevertheless genuine. Appeal dismissed.
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c15135 _d15135