000			01465cab a2200193 4500
001			ABS40271
008			090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u22702
041			_aeng
245			_aGraysmark v South Hams DC
260			_c1989
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1989) 03 EG 75-77(2)
520			_aCA 4 July 1988. An appeal against an LT decision by Graysmark (G), challenging the basis of compensation for loss due to a stop notice determined under the Town and Country Planning Act 1971 s177 . Briefly, G was involved in development of land and was granted consent by the authority. The planning authority then decided that the plans submitted were inaccurate and served an enforcement notice followed by a stop notice. The planning authority was wrong in taking this action and the LT concluded that G was entitled to compensation for loss or damage directly attributable to the prohibition in the stop notice. The amount of compensation determined by the LT was £1,976. G appealed claiming compensation of £426,000. In the CA the judge rejected most of G`s claims. The LT had correctly assessed compensation under two heads; 1) interest on expenditure incurred on the development prohibited by the stop notice and 2) deferment of the profit which would have been made if the development had n
650			_aLIESBOSCH PRINCIPLE
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c15218 _d15218