| 000 | 01578cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS40273 | ||
| 008 | 090401s1989xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u22718 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aPicton Jones & Co v Arcadia Developments Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c(1989 03 EG 85-88(3) | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1989 03 EG 85-88(3) |
||
| 520 | _aQBD 14 October 1988. A trial of a preliminary issue in an action between a firm of chartered surveyors (P), against a firm who ran amusement arcades (A), claiming entitlement for professional fees for instructions carried out by P to acquire properties for use as amusement arcades. P entered into an agreement with A to find new sites and obtain permits and planning permission for the sites so that they could expand their business. The fee basis agreed on the terms "planning and permit - a global fee at £10,000 to be paid in the event of ultimate success ". (This was increased later, by agreement, to £15,000). Although the work was carried out successfully, A rejected liability for payment of the fees arguing that the "ultimate success" provision was champertous and thus unlawful and unenforceable, and that P had acted contrary to the rules of the RICS . P claimed to the Court for their fees. It was held that the fees were recoverable at law; the doctrine of champerty is confined to a | ||
| 650 | _aCONTRACT LAW | ||
| 650 | _aLEISURE PROPERTY | ||
| 650 | _aRICS BYE=LAWS | ||
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE | ||
| 942 |
_n0 _2ddc |
||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c15230 _d15230 |
||